Rjack wrote:
I have argued that a compiler adds no creative element to qualify the "translation" because of its fixed algorithms but this is a legally unsupported *conjecture*.
It is the codified practice of the US Copyright Office. <http://ipmall.info/hosted_resources/CopyrightCompendium/chapter_0300.asp> _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
