Hi, Alex! In gnu.misc.discuss Alexander Terekhov <[email protected]> wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie wrote: > Take off your blinders, Alan. > http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp > (from the complaint) > ------ > 11. Upon information and belief, Verizon distributes to its customers > the Actiontec MI424WR wireless router (?Infringing Product?), which > contains embedded executable software (?Firmware?). Defendant also > provides the Firmware corresponding to the Infringing Product for > download via its website, at > http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp. > 12. Upon information and belief, the Firmware contains BusyBox, or a > modified version of BusyBox that is substantially similar to BusyBox, in > object code or executable form. Distribution of the Firmware, either as > part of the Infringing Product or by itself, thus inherently includes > distribution of BusyBox and, as such, Defendant is required to have > Plaintiffs? permission to make any such distribution. The only such > permission available for BusyBox is the contingent one granted under the > License. > ------ > http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2007/dec/07/busybox/verizon.pdf > Got it now, Alan? What are you trying to say, here? Are you trying to make some sort of point? > regards, > alexander. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany). _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
