"amicus_curious" <[email protected]> writes: > "Thufir Hawat" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... >> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 09:51:24 -0500, amicus_curious wrote: >> >>> But the BusyBox authors are totally willing to give their work away and >>> have been doing so for years. The only thing that they are hammering >>> their users in regard to is for not publishing the acknowledgement and >>> code itself on the user's own site. >> >> >> Exactly, if you choose to distribute *their* work then there are >> conditions. What's wrong with that? > > The conditions are silly and useless, making the authors appear to be > the same.
So what? You don't seem to have much of a problem with being silly and useless, certainly being much more so than the BusyBox authors. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
