Thufir Hawat wrote:
On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 10:55:35 -0500, Rjack wrote:
Any copying beyond that point is copyright infringement --
the GPL itself says so.
The court will ignore what the GPL says and instead rely on
what The Copyright Act of 1976 (As Amended) says in light of
prevailing federal and state law.
which imposes steep penalties per infraction. To avoid those
steep penalties a settlement will be agreed to. The settlement?
Follow the GPL.
The settlement agreement will, of course, be an agreement to pay
Cisco's attorney fees and require the SFLC to voluntarily dismiss
their silly propaganda suit -- same as always.
Nothing short of review by a court will settle the legal
enforcability of the GPL. The SFLC will NEVER, NEVER voluntarily
allow a federal district judge to interpret the GPL on the merits.
Sincerely,
Rjack :)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
