Hyman Rosen wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > The court order didn't say that the lawsuit is automatically restored > > due to plaintiffs "changing their minds within a month." > > <http://www.terekhov.de/GPLvCisco/DISMISSAL.pdf> > either party may apply to this Court by letter before May 21, 2009 > for restoration of the action to the Court's calendar > > > enough is enough, I throw you out of this court immediately
Why would the *defendant* ever "apply to this Court by letter before May 21, 2009 for restoration of the action [dismissed WITH PREJUDICE] to the Court's calendar", Hyman? Any ideas? LOL. > > <http://www.terekhov.de/GPLvCisco/DISMISSAL.pdf> > both parties consented to a thirty-day order dismissing this > action with prejudice It says that the defendant has no objection regarding the plaintiff's right to apply for restoration of the dismissed (WITH PREJUDICE) action within a month. > > If you're going to lie, twist, and spin, you should at least be > clever enough not to be contradicted (as usual) by links in your > own postings. Go to doctor, Hyman. regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
