Rjack wrote:
Uhhhh... what's murky?
A rights holder can both have offered non-exclusive grants, and subsequently transferred copyright ownership. How all of this would interact with the world of open licenses, where signed agreements are generally non-existent and works are handed off from one third party to another with the licensed consent of the author, is quite unclear. As usual, you choose to claim that the outcome would be such as to disfavor the intended operation of the GPL, but also as usual, there is no reason to believe your claim. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
