Hyman Rosen wrote:
Rjack wrote:
17 USC 301(a) frightens you doesn't it?
Huh? Why would it frighten me? Quite the contrary, it makes it
easier to talk about copyright because it usually limits the laws
involved to only 17 USC, instead of having to look for various
separate state laws. It doesn't require addressing in the context
of the GPL because it has nothing to do with copyright licenses.
Nothing to do with copyright licenses eh?
You've gone off the deep end in denial Hyman. Try googling
["copyright license" "court of appeals" "preempted" decided] and read
a few of the 1170 hits.
Are you in the Obama "birthers" movement with the wingnuts?
Sincerely,
Rjack
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
