Hyman Rosen wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > And that allegedly severed "legal relationship" being what > > exactly, to begin with? > > The extra permissions granted to them by the copyright > holder, above those allowed by copyright law.
And on basis of what law do you think that Appeelees are obliged to let third parties know about those "extra permissions granted to them by the copyright holder, above those allowed by copyright law", Hyman? > > > What makes you/SFLC think that those other "licensees" *never* > > become aware of their rights? > > If ... An "if" hypothetical is not evidence. "The District Court found that the record contains no evidence of past irreparable harm suffered by Jacobsen and the record contains no evidence of any future threat. This finding is sound." http://terekhov.de/2009-1221/AppelleeBrief.pdf regards, alexander. P.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_telephone_number Hth, Hyman. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
