Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > Rjack <u...@example.net> wrote: > > > Here's the point. If you are an owner of a computer program copyright, > > and license someone else to make a copy of your work on a physical > > medium that is owned by the licensee then "Notwithstanding the > > provisions of section 106(3)" gives the licensee (the lawful owner) of > > that copy of a computer program the right to dispose of that copy as > > long is it a transfer of ownership but not by rental, lease, or lending. > > > It's the PHYSICAL MEDIUM and not the MESSENGER that counts! > > Yes. But is that transfer of ownership not still subject to the license > conditions?
LOL. Read 17 USC 109, silly. See the words "is entitled, without the authority of the copyright owner" do you? What does it mean to a brainwashed GNUtian like you, Alan? regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
