On 1/8/2010 5:39 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
The NYSD court seems to get fed up with SFLC practice
> of filing delay stipulations.
"No further extensions for this, or any defendant in this action, will
be granted. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 1/6/10) (cd)
(Entered: 01/07/2010)"
http://www.terekhov.de/09-cv-10155/19.pdf
I'm glad to see that your habit of posting documents which
directly contradict your thesis remains unchanged.
plaintiffs and GCI ... hereby stipulate and agree that
the time within which GCI may respond to the Complaint
filed by the plaintiffs is hereby extended through and
including March 8, 2010. ...
(handwritten) No further extensions...
And the title of this document is
STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING TIME OF DEFENDANT
GCI TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
It is only in the bizarrely insane twists of your mind
that a one-time extension granted to the defendants could
be construed as criticism of the plaintiffs.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
