Hyman Rosen <[email protected]> writes: > On 2/3/2010 6:36 PM, RJack wrote: >> The SFLC will NEVER, NEVER allow this to happen > > In every single case filed by the SFLC, the defendants > have come into proper compliance with the GPL.
And not because the court cases would have been about the GPL, but because the have been about copying without license. Since acceptance of the GPL is entirely optional, there will not be cases about the "merits" of the GPL as such. There might just be cases about differing interpretations of particular clauses. This has not happened so far either. So it would appear that the GPL is sufficiently clear to concerned parties not to need further interpretation in court. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
