RJack <u...@example.net> writes: > Nick Daly wrote: >> Dear Alexander, >> >> I just wanted to compose a little note thanking you for your recent >> work. You've clarified a few licensing questions that I've had by >> getting me thinking and providing the best-ever examples of the most >> important details. In reference to the GemRB project and it's >> separate-but-associated-installer, I was troubled, as both the >> project and its installer are distributed together, but will soon be >> under different versions of the GPL. Thus, two licenses would exist >> across a single project. Fortunately, you provided the most eloquent >> guidance to the situation's solution with your incessant nattering >> about the interpretation of "mere aggregation" and "interpretation". > > "Incessant nattering"? > What do you think you're doing here? Working on a Pulitzer?
You are more like working on poo. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
