David Kastrup wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov <[email protected]> writes: > > > At some point, the New York bar will have no choice but to disbar the > > entire gang of utterly incompetent GNU arch legal beagles from SFLC > > for consistent filing of frivolous lawsuits such as > > http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2009/dec/14/busybox-gpl-lawsuit/ > > in which (1) "the Software Freedom Conservancy" is utterly frivolous > > 'plaintiff' because it doesn't own ANY busybox copyrights and (2) Erik > > Andersen is also utterly frivolous 'plaintiff' because he was NOT > > joined by Bruce Perens and other contributors to the joint work known > > as busybox at http://busybox.net/. > > Under your legal theories, Apple could not sue for violation of MacOSX > licenses unless Berkeley university joins their lawsuit.
A compilation work which you call 'MacOSX' is a collective work (see 17 USC 101 for both 'compilation' and 'collective work') of Apple and only Apple, silly. Erik Andersen's alleged (and fraudulent in fact) claim of ownership is about "New and revised computer source code" and NOT A COMPILATION WORK you stupid dak. http://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?v1=2&ti=1,2&Search%5FArg=busybox&Search%5FCode=TALL&CNT=25&PID=C56aDfGGYoWR1oMK5BIoLaV4QdHU7&SEQ=20100210103005&SID=1 regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
