Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > David Kastrup wrote: >> >> Alexander Terekhov <terek...@web.de> writes: >> >> > David Kastrup wrote: >> > [...] >> >> Why would a defendant make the GPLed sources available >> > >> > There's no reason to do it -- to wit: >> > >> > http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp >> >> That's a link to a firmware upgrade. "This firmware update is >> applicable to both Actiontec and Verizon branded FiOS Routers." As I >> hear, those routers come with a manual detailing where to get the >> source >> to the firmware. The links have been pointed out to you as well. > > That "where to get" is NOT Verizon's location and has nothing to do with > Verison's location above, silly dak. >
Oh, and you twit can certainly point to the exact place in the GPL where it is stated that the source *absolutely* has to be supplied from the same location you got the binary from? You get dumber by the second -- I say you need to visit Clues 'R' Us. They are having a special on slightly used clues. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
