On 2/10/2010 6:29 PM, RJack wrote:
????????????????? OUTSIDE OF COPYRIGHT LAW? ?????????????????????????? That's pure contract law for those GPL users! Oh dear Hyman, just show me the downstream contractual "privity" required to make this crackpot scheme enforcable.
Anyone who does not believe that the GPL is meaningful must then limit himself to using GPLed code only in the way pure copyright law allows, since they have nothing else which grants them the ability to do otherwise. That's fine. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
