On 2/16/2010 4:09 PM, RJack wrote:
Hyman: Uh your honor, I received permission from some unknown authors to create this derivative work. It's a new work known under copyright law as a derivative of a 'compilation of derivative works by unknown authors'.
The work is licensed. There is no reason to disbelieve the license, when it is a well-known license used for a great deal of software. Nothing in the definitions of collective work and derivative work suggests that one cannot form a derivative work of a collective work. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
