Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/21/2010 1:25 PM, RJack wrote:
How can someone infringe on another's copyrighted work without
violating one the specific exclusive rights as described in
sections 106 through 122 and section 106(A)? The answer to this
question could resolve many disagreements among open source license
debaters.
Why do you believe that someone is claiming copyright infringement
outside of the enumerated rights of 17 USC 106? Even the FSF's wrong
opinion about dynamic linking rests on the incorrect belief that it
involves creating a derivative work, which is one of the enumerated
exclusive rights. The claims are about copying and distributing
works without permission of their rights holders, just as in 17 USC
106.
You seem very confused. Perhaps it is time for you to mention
preemption again?
I was addressing the Jacobsen decision and "rights" of attribution. Me
thinks *you're* confused. Moron.
Sincerely,
RJack :)
"Captain Moglen scared them out of the water!"
http://www.fini.tv/blog/finishing_line_files/a44f9390355368f87dc47b7ec094f93e-36.php
ROFL. ROFL. ROFL.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
