On 2/23/2010 12:00 PM, RJack wrote:
Give it up Alexander. It's Hyman Rosen vs. the United States Supreme
Court. Hyman will just indulge in his denial ad infinitum. There is no
logical way to counter a retreat into solipsistic denial. It is just as
futile as attempting to prove a negative. Hyman will just ignore the
Supreme Court decision as if it didn't exist and continue to quote the
Federal Circuit's erroneous finding.
Save your ink for conscious entities.
There is no conflict with the Supreme Court. The infringing
use was copying and distribution, infringing because it was
done contrary to the conditions demanded by the rights holders.
No court's findings are erroneous until another court makes
them so. Until then, there is a valid decision and no amount
of complaining by people who don't like it will make it any
less so.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
