On 2/26/2010 8:05 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
RJack<u...@example.net> writes:
It's obvious the defendants aren't the slightest bit intimidated by
the SFLC clowns.
Why else would they make the GPLed source available in the aftermath of
the settlements?
He means the new defendants. Remember, to anti-GPL cranks,
every case is the one that will finally break the back of
the GPL. Until it doesn't, and then it's because the SFLC
"cut and run" or because the judge was drunk, or it's in a
court whose precedents aren't binding, or any of a million
other excuses.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
