On 3/22/2010 1:08 PM, RJack wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 3/22/2010 11:30 AM, RJack wrote:
It is easily verified that neither link leads to the alleged
infringed program source code.
Of what use is a transparent lie?
"Transparent lie"? "TRANSPARENT LIE"???????????????????
Show me a link to the source code for BusyBox, v.0.60.3 and I'll kiss
your lyin' ass on the public courthouse square.
Why do they need to provide the source code to v.0.60.3?
They need to provide the source code to the version they
copy and distribute. Do you have reason to believe that
v.0.60.3 is the version they copy and distribute?
The source code for BusyBox is included in
<http://www.cortex-pro.com/upload/march122010/hdc-3000.zip>.
Most of the stuff in BusyBox v.0.60.3 is derivative of BSD4.4-lite
and is not original work by BusyBox authors anyway.
Any modification in functionality is sufficient to create a
derivative work. It does not have to satisfy any notion of
"originality". Anyone who wishes to copy and distribute a
non-GPLed early version of BusyBox may do so under whatever
license that version permits.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
