Raffael Cavallaro writes: > Using them would place their employer or the commercial organization > to which they belong under the obligation of publishing all of the > source code for any released product that included your library.
They are not required to publish it. They are merely required to distribute it along with the binaries. If you offer source to everyone to whom you sell binaries you are done. > As a result, most people working on commercial [closed source] > published software, or who contemplate doing so in the future, simply > avoid gpl libraries altogether. And that's fine, just as it is fine that some of us avoid non-free libraries because source is not available or the terms are too restrictive. Nicolas writes: > Here is a question which I find rather interesting: Is in-house use of > GPLed software allowed? Yes. > But in the case of multiple developers inside a company one > could either argue that the company operates as an entity... It does. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss