Hyman Rosen wrote: > > On 3/16/2010 2:43 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > The "unadorned" copyright doesn't not put restrictions on terms and > > conditions of licensing of the new copyright in a derivative work (which > > is exclusive rights and which belongs to the author of derivative work) > > "to all third parties" thereby creating a right against the world > > governed under state law of contract akin to the GPL. > > "Doesn't not"?
The "unadorned" copyright doesn't, (does) not put restrictions on terms and conditions of licensing of the new copyright in a derivative work (which is exclusive right and which belongs to the author of derivative work) "to all third parties" thereby creating a right against the world governed under state law of contract akin to the GPL. > Anyway, you fail to understand copyright law, as usual. A http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091020161950.htm Hth, Hyman. regards, alexander. P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system so that I can do the builds." Hyman Rosen <[email protected]> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress." Hyman Rosen <[email protected]> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
