Alexander Terekhov <terek...@web.de> writes: > Hyman Rosen wrote: >> >> On 4/12/2010 4:39 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: >> > the claim is of copyright/tort, not license/contract. >> >> The claim is for copyright infringement. > > Copyright infringement is a tort you idiot. Note that SFLC's claim of > copyright infringement is baseless and frivolous: > > "Defendant denies that Mr. Anderson is the author or developer of the > BusyBox computer program, and the owner of the copyright in that > computer program. "
Well, if things are clear like that, we'll have the case thrown out of court without defendants getting into compliance, in no time at all. Really, you _have_ to stop confusing either party's claims with the verdict. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
