Alexander Terekhov <terek...@web.de> writes: > Hyman Rosen wrote: >> >> On 4/14/2010 5:45 PM, RJack wrote: >> > The GPL license *willfully* misleads people. >> >> Anti-GPL cranks claim to be misled by the GPL, >> because they want to steal the work of other >> people without compensating those people in the >> way they have chosen. > > See > > http://www.terekhov.de/Samsung-Answer.pdf > > for TWENTY (20) reasons why it is perfectly fine to 'steal' GPL'd > work.
Let the judge agree on any of those reasons, and then come back here. Or let Samsung drop out of the case without causing the GPLed sources to be available to the respective customers in a reasonable time frame. If neither of those two events happen (and in no court case so far anything like that happened, so that should give a good clue about how probable they are), your "perfectly fine" thesis seems quite shaky. So far you are batting zero in that respect, for all the years of your trumpeting around here. That's not all that close to "perfect" unless you are living in a fantasy world. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
