Alexander Terekhov <terek...@web.de> writes: > Hyman Rosen wrote: >> >> On 4/19/2010 5:08 PM, Keith Thompson wrote: >> > Just curious, in what sense is it "instructive"? >> >> One might otherwise believe that the anti-GPL crank position >> is simply a different interpretation of law and circumstance >> in an "agree to disagree" sort of way. > > Only silly freetards would tolerate utter nonsense such as > > "Thus, if the terms of the Artistic License allegedly violated are both > covenants and conditions, they may serve to limit the scope of the > license and are governed by copyright law."
That would make the defendants of this case silly freetards since they heeded the verdict. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
