On 4/20/2010 4:55 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
"Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract [1] Elements and Case Citations (1) Defendant and a third-party entered a valid contract; (2) Plaintiff is not a party to the contract; (3) The parties to the contract intended that the contract primarily or directly benefit plaintiff or a class of parties of which plaintiff is a member; (4) The contract is breached; (5) Plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the breach.
Why are you describing this? In the U.S., there have been no such suits with respect to the GPL or other open licenses. The GPL itself is not such a license, but even if it were, the only lawsuits have been brought by rights holders. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
