On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:00:31 -0400, RJack wrote: > On 8/5/2010 9:13 PM, voodoo wrote: >> On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 18:24:06 -0400, RJack wrote: >> >>> On 7/28/2010 8:41 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: >>>> SFLC gang 'won' $90,000 + attorneys fees and costs and expenses >>>> against LONG INSOLVENT AND ASSETS-DISSOLVED DEFENCELESS defendant on >>>> default. >>>> >>>> Congrats to Eben Moglen and his underlings. >>>> >>>> LOL. >>>> >>>> >>> Uh... PJ over at Groklaw says the default judgment against Western >>> Digital proves, "Of course, to collect the money, the plaintiffs must >> >> that would be westinghouse digital. westinghouse is that company from >> the last century that makes heavy electric equipment. >> >> western digital makes disk drives and is not a part of this issue. > > You are correct. It is Westinghouse Digital. There is certainly strong > grounds to appeal the default judgment by Westinghouse's successors in > interest.
How long have they got to start the appeal process? _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
