On Jun 29, 2:05 pm, Alexander Terekhov <[email protected]> wrote: > Like many other critics of the patentability of software, I hoped that > the Supreme Court would not only uphold the decision of the previous > instance (the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit), which had > declared the claimed "invention" ineligible for patentability: that was > widely expected. This case would also have been a splendid opportunity > for the Supreme Court to draw a line and establish a reasonably > restrictive set of rules that would either do away with many business > method patents or, ideally, go even further and up the ante for software > patent applications. > > Unfortunately, the Supreme Court delivered an opinion that doesn't help > the cause of partial or complete abolition of software patents at all.
Justice has prevailed, if this clown is disappointed by Bilski. Note the .de foreign (German) domain. A God-damn foreigner displeased by US IP law. Smells like victory to me. RL RL _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
