[email protected] (Alfred M. Szmidt) wrote: > Whatʼs about Readline and Tivoization, though? > > With Readline I was refering to how GNU clisp used readline
Ah! Thanks. > > To understand a opposition, one needs to know the why. Taking your > statement at face value as to what might have been said, that is, calling > other free systems for "lesser systems" would be unfriendly and unkind, so > why do that? That in it self would be a good reason to strongly object to > such a statement since it would alienate people working on other free systems. > > > > But now knowing the precise words used, making any fair analysis of the > decision is hard, and a simply way to find a false reasoning is to call it > "stubborn" or similar. > > Sorry, I re-read this several times, yet still do not follow. Could you > recap it in a simpler language? > > You mentioned opposition as to why Guix shouldn't be "the GNU system", but > not the reasoning behind the opposition. I was trying to explain why the > opposition, based on your account, would have made sense -- in that making > the claim that other systems are "less important would" have been counter > productive. > > Does that better explain it? Yes, sure. When I said, that I do not follow, I mostly meant your second paragraph. Maybe I too stupid, but I still do not. What `precise words' do we know now?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
