Le mercredi 6 novembre 2019 19:31:17 CET, vous avez écrit : > Hello, > > I will reply once more, but it may be the last time in this thread. Please, > Alexandre and others, if you wish to contribute, stop rambling and come to > the point, and actually try to stick to a point that is raised and avoid > going off on lengthy tangents that I (and probably others) have no time > to read.
Sorry, I have this problem of being pretty verbose :/ it’s not intentional, and on many places I indeed just resort to shut up (because otherwise I’m not welcome anymore). > How on earth do you end up associating "we welcome contributors" Not this but “harassment-free” > with > "censorship", "exclusion", "banning", "feminism" or "feminism-agnosticism"? Because harassment is often associated with sexism, and a policy to be enforced need some action, as you state after: > Notice that the social contract is a statement of principles. Clearly if > we want to provide a harassment-free environment, some procedure will have > to be decided at some point in time in case harassment occurs; but this is > not the goal of this document. > Of course you are free to send your stream of consciousness to this list, > but if you wish to have an impact on the topic at hand, I would suggest to > make concrete suggestions on wording, or paragraphs to remove or to add. The subject contains a question mark, and I already previously spoke against the very concept of a “GNU social contract”. I preferred not repeating myself but as this may have been done to a different sub-thread I’m coming to think Dora was right and with such lengthy discussions repetition unfortunately becomes necessary…