One cannot assume good faith from those who are clearly hostile to the GNU project. You've shown over and over again, even in your last email claiming that the FSF somehow appointed Brandon as a co-chief of the GNU project, that you have no intention to listen to those who are part of the leadership structure (like Brandon) who know what they are talking about.
If you were interested, and in good faith, you would have raised the topic on the internal lists, as was requested, but you have not. And as far as I can see, there is still no reply to the question if you/Ludo/... are willing to let the GNU project take the text that you've drafted as some sort of starting point? > Patently false, it is RMS who ratifies changes that are applicable to > the GNU project and nobody else. Please stop spreading these made up > notions of how the GNU project is governed. We are discussing how we want the GNU project to be governed. This is simply my opinion how we can collectively come together describing it. I do acknowledge that you feel differently about that. No, you are discussing how _you_ want the GNU project governed, this we is fictional -- there is no we here. There is no collective agreement, since there is no "we". The GNU project is maintained by RMS.