I didn't miss it. You have posted Richard's message a couple of times on various public lists and I have already replied twice explaining what I believe are some misunderstandings about this initiative. You can read my answers here:
That you think it is a misunderstanding, or not, isn't really what is relevant. What is relevant that this is the position of the GNU project. The GNU project hasn't declared that your initiative isn't supported, rather that it isn't an initiative by the GNU project nor an initative that the GNU project will do. So what has been said is the exact opposite of what you purport. So why don't you quote the statement verbatim? Or do you not wish to have a discussion which shows both sides fairly?
