Alexandre François Garreau, le sam. 22 févr. 2020 19:21:18 +0100, a ecrit: > I recall some of them (likely one of those you’re thinking about is the > same as I),
Possibly. > > > you prefer to “aknowledge” this “will have to be done at some > > > point”. Is if there wasn’t any middle ground for compromision > > > there. > > > > Sometimes you can't find any. > > No, you can’t know. Strictly speaking, sure, but at some point when things only get worse and worse, it's way better to resort to exclusion than continuing to see a project get stuck due to only one person, even if with several dozen years you might find a solution. > > > The idea of shared kill/blacklist or /ignore have been already > > > proposed. That solves it. > > > > Not necessarily for less strong people. Just leaving out is simpler than > > having to yet again set up some filters and everything. > > If it could be automatic, nope, it would *even politically* be more > simple, if it was decentralized (yet automatic). Think of a WoT of > blacklists, for instance. How different is this from exclusion? Samuel
