Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss), le sam. 22 févr. 2020 13:17:06 -0800, a ecrit: > On 2020-02-22 12:43, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss), le sam. 22 févr. 2020 10:22:55 -0800, a > > ecrit: > > > But does it? If inexperienced people are a protected class, then it > > > doesn't matter how the blocking is done. The blocking violates the > > > social > > > contract and that's that. > > > > Could you avoid interpreting everything either pure black or pure white? > > The point is that if you codify things in documents, you *have* to > 'debug' those documents through a black and white interpretation, > because that interpretation will happen.
We were talking about my mail, it's not meant to be codifying. > > > In what industrialized nation can you not reject job applicants for > > > low > > > experience, due to that being discrimination against a > > > constitutionally > > > protected class? > > > > The protection is against harassment, not about getting changes > > commited. > > I don't see wording to that effect, though; that's just what you think. The text does precisely say "harassment". Samuel
