> .ly.tex:
>       lilypond $<
> 
> .tex.dvi:
>       ly2dvi32 $<
> 
> There are obvious holes, scsii-cello.ly actually includes the rest of
> the .ly files,

But why is that a problem? 

>ly2dvi32 doesn't currently have a --output-name option,

then ly2dvi32 should be extended.

> and unless I missed something, lilypond actually has to run to generate
> a .dep file.

Yep, but that is no problem.  If there is no .dep file, there is no
.dvi file, so the dependency would be out of date anyway.

>Am I on the right track?  What did you have in mind for
> a Make structure?

Just writing .dep files is good enough; they are simply included
by stepmake. The rest of the machinery for .ly -> .dvi is there already.

-- 

Han-Wen Nienhuys, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** GNU LilyPond - The Music Typesetter 
      http://www.cs.uu.nl/people/hanwen/lilypond/index.html 

Reply via email to