Hi guys,

Yesterday I performed some trepanation on LilyPond, and the result
seems to be working.  I made some modifications that should reduce the
memory requirements slightly. If you use LilyPond for large projects,
Could you try to measure if there are any improvements in memory
performance? (Mats?)


pl 33.uu2
        - some performance cleanups: junked PointerList instance, plugged some leaks.
        - style -> fontname now in scheme.
        - minor Score_element brainsurgery:
                * generic element properties.
                * junked Score_element::junk_links, Score_element::unlink
                * junked Directed_graph_node as superclass of
Score_element, this should reduce mem usage a bit.

pl 33.jcn2
        - fixed autobeamer's beam->unlink ()

pl 33.jcn1
        - allow autobeaming according to duration iso (crude) multiplicity

pl 33.jbr1
         - change my email address
         - Windows platform does a cp -r instead of a ln -s

pl 33.uu1
        - bf: ^ and _
        - junked poor man's dynamics.


-- 

Han-Wen Nienhuys, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** GNU LilyPond - The Music Typesetter 
      http://www.cs.uu.nl/people/hanwen/lilypond/index.html 

Reply via email to