[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Inspired by Wan-Wen's motto: 'Backward compatibility sucks',
> I introduce on new option for mudela-book, and remove
> two old.
>
> * Mudela-book will scan mudela-code to see if it has to
> add paper-definition and \score{\notes{...}}
> * If the code is only voice-contents (no \score):
> linewidth = -1 (This makes 'fragment' obsolete)
This is all nice, but I have another motto: "Programs that exhibit
intelligent behaviour suck". In other words, what if I would like to
do this:
\begin{mudela}[fragment]
% no \score { } here
% no \paper either
c4 c4
\end{mudela}
how would mudela-book cope? I think it would be best to allow these
autodectected settings to be overridden.
> One question: Should doco for accordion-symbols go
> into refman or an own file?
I'd say that accordion symbols are exotic enough to go in a sepearate file.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** GNU LilyPond - The Music Typesetter
http://www.cs.uu.nl/people/hanwen/lilypond/index.html
