[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> ... It looks like lexical scoping rather > >> than dynamic binding is the order of the day in lilypond, and I wonder > >> if over all, from the user perspective, if it wouldn't be better --- > >> simpler if a different binding method were used. Perhaps message > >> passing would improve the situation. > > I have read over what you (Scott) wrote several times and have tried > unsuccessfully to see a situation where dynamic scoping would be better > (in *any* way) to lexical scoping. I can accept this as a shortcoming The remark is all the more puzzling since \property is dynamically scoped: by doing a staff-switch, you can change the \property value that a voice sees. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/ _______________________________________________ Gnu-music-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-music-discuss
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance? Jan Nieuwenhuizen
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance? Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance? Scott Ballantyne
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance? Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance? Mats Bengtsson
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance? Scott Ballantyne
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritanc... Mats Bengtsson
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritanc... Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheri... Scott Ballantyne
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance? David R. Linn
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance? Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance? Scott Ballantyne
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance? Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] Inheritance? Mats Bengtsson
- Re: [Gnu-music-discuss] variable binding... Scott Ballantyne
- message passing... Scott Ballantyne
- message passing... Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: message passing... Scott Ballantyne
- Re: message passing... Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: message passing... Mats Bengtsson
