[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> * Move some reference manual into the SCM documentation system.
Great! Much of this information has been missing or outdated
in the manual. Some comments:
- Can this information be included in the manual (as an appendix?)?
It's a pity if the information is only available in HTML.
- In order to use a property via the \push interface, I have to
know the context, the engraver, the object, the property name
and the set of allowed values. Now this information is spread
out and if I've found a property in an object, the only way to
find the engraver and context, is an extensive search (at least
if I use the official documentation). In order to make this
practically useful, we need links back from each object, telling
which engraver it belongs to and in which context(s) it's
included.
- Do I, as a user, ever have to bother about which specific
interface a certain property belongs to?
- I find it confusing that we have different kind of properties
that are handled different ways. "Engraver properties" are
set with
\property Context.property = value
whereas the "object properties" are (preferably) set with
\property Context.Object \push #'property = value
What are the future plans? To keep both kinds of properties
or move all of them to the latter form or ...?
/Mats
_______________________________________________
Gnu-music-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-music-discuss
