Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> there is not much, but I'd like to expand in that direction: we have a
> blot-diameter, that should cause the smaller glyphs to be a little
> chubbier. It is not used by many glyphs, though.
also the number glyphs have some extra corrections, as they are really
used in a big range of sizes.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
_______________________________________________
Gnu-music-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-music-discuss
