gnu-system-discuss  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ? bendikker
  • Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ? Jean Louis
  • Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ? bendikker
  • Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ? Jason Self
  • Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ? Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ? Richard Stallman
  • Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ? Jean Louis
• ARMv8-A port Marc Dunivan
• GNU Guix 1.0.1 released Ludovic Courtès
• GNU Guix 1.0.0 released Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released Thompson, David
  • Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released Christopher Lemmer Webber
  • Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released Jérémy Korwin-Zmijowski
  • Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released Katherine Cox-Buday
  • Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released David Pirotte
  • Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released Nala Ginrut
  • Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released vikram sai balaji ulaganathan
  • Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released Amirouche Boubekki
  • Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released BlueT - Matthew Lien - 練喆明
  • Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released Jude Rubini
  • Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released Kete
  • Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released Dimakakos Dimos
• Release information for GZip APCoEProductNotifications
  • Re: Release information for GZip Eric Blake
• Candidates for Decommission https://www.gnu.org/software/software.html bendikker
  • Re: Candidates for Decommission https://www.gnu.org/software/software.html Adam Sampson
• GNU package hello unmaintained? bendikker
  • Re: GNU package hello unmaintained? Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU package hello unmaintained? bendikker
  • Re: GNU package hello unmaintained? Alfred M. Szmidt
• Gnash is dead? bendikker
  • Re: Gnash is dead? Patrice Dumas
  • Re: Gnash is dead? دانیال بهزادی
  • Re: Gnash is dead? Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Gnash is dead? Richard Stallman
• gnu.org/software corrections bendikker
  • Re: gnu.org/software corrections Richard Stallman
• Counting software and the laws znavko
  • Re: Counting software and the laws Jean Louis
  • Re: Counting software and the laws Richard Stallman
  • Counting software and the laws swedebugia
  • Re: Counting software and the laws Richard Stallman
• GNU Guix & GuixSD 0.16.0 released Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: GNU Guix & GuixSD 0.16.0 released Pierre Neidhardt
  • Re: GNU Guix & GuixSD 0.16.0 released Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
  • Re: GNU Guix & GuixSD 0.16.0 released Pjotr Prins
• GNU Guix & GuixSD 0.15.0 released Ludovic Courtès
• GNU Guix & GuixSD 0.14.0 released Ludovic Courtès
• 2006 download link deltagi M
  • Re: 2006 download link Ian Kelling
• ISOC poll hellekin
• Extends GNU project goals (or let's aim for the stars) Amirouche
  • Re: Extends GNU project goals (or let's aim for the stars) Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Extends GNU project goals (or let's aim for the stars) Nala Ginrut
  • Re: Extends GNU project goals (or let's aim for the stars) Amirouche
  • Re: Extends GNU project goals (or let's aim for the stars) Nala Ginrut
• GNU Guix & GuixSD 0.13.0 released Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: GNU Guix & GuixSD 0.13.0 released Catonano
• GNU CDN? (was: CloudFlare, not good choice) Nomen Nescio
  • Re: GNU CDN? Mike Gerwitz
• Re: CloudFlare, not good choice Anonymous
• [no subject] Anonymous
  • Re: Alfred M. Szmidt
• Re: state of gnuradio freedom and security issues Anonymous
  • Re: state of gnuradio freedom and security issues Anonymous
• state of gnuradio freedom and security issues (was: gnuradio project DoS..) Anonymous
  • Re: state of gnuradio freedom and security issues (was: gnuradio project DoS..) Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: state of gnuradio freedom and security issues (was: gnuradio project DoS..) Jean Louis
  • Re: state of gnuradio freedom and security issues (was: gnuradio project DoS..) Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: state of gnuradio freedom and security issues (was: gnuradio project DoS..) Richard Stallman
  • Re: state of gnuradio freedom and security issues (was: gnuradio project DoS..) Jean Louis
  • Re: state of gnuradio freedom and security issues (was: gnuradio project DoS..) Jean Louis
  • Re: state of gnuradio freedom and security issues (was: gnuradio project DoS..) Richard Stallman
• Re: [security-discuss] gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Anonymous
  • Re: [security-discuss] gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Jean Louis
  • Re: [security-discuss] gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: [security-discuss] gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Assaf Gordon
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Anonymous
• Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Anonymous
• Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Nomen Nescio
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Richard Stallman
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Nomen Nescio
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Anonymous
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Nomen Nescio
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Jean Louis
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Mike Gerwitz
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Anonymous
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Mike Gerwitz
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Nomen Nescio
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Mike Gerwitz
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Brandon Invergo
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Brandon Invergo
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Nomen Nescio
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Brandon Invergo
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Nomen Nescio
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Richard Stallman
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Nomen Nescio
  • CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist) Jean Louis
  • Re: CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist) Mike Gerwitz
  • Re: CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist) Richard Stallman
  • Re: CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist) Jean Louis
  • Re: CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist) Richard Stallman
  • Re: CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist) carl hansen
  • problem 5: GNU's Tor endorsement undermined (was: CloudFlare, not good choice) Anonymous
  • Re: CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist) Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist) Jean Louis
  • Re: CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist) Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist) Richard Stallman
  • Re: CloudFlare, not good choice, (Re: [security-discuss] Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist) Jean Louis
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Anonymous
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Anonymous
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist Alfred M. Szmidt
• why Tor whitelisting is a bad idea (was: gnuradio project..) Nomen Nescio
• [no subject] Nomen Nescio
  • Re: Paolo Bonzini
• Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist (was: gnuradio..) Anonymous
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist (was: gnuradio..) Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Freedom 0: the utilitarian vs. the deontologist (was: gnuradio..) Richard Stallman
• FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations (was: s/w that requires middleman..) Anonymous
  • Re: FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations (was: s/w that requires middleman..) Svetlana Tkachenko
  • Re: FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations (was: s/w that requires middleman..) Svetlana Tkachenko
  • Re: FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations (was: s/w that requires middleman..) Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations (was: s/w that requires middleman..) Svetlana Tkachenko
  • Re: FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations (was: s/w that requires middleman..) Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations (was: s/w that requires middleman..) Jean Louis
  • Re: FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations (was: s/w that requires middleman..) Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations (was: s/w that requires middleman..) Jean Louis
  • Re: FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations (was: s/w that requires middleman..) Ricardo Wurmus
  • Re: FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations (was: s/w that requires middleman..) Svetlana Tkachenko
  • Re: FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations Anonymous
  • Re: FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations (was: s/w that requires middleman..) Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: FSF has a duty to flag GNU Radio for violations (was: s/w that requires middleman..) Richard Stallman
• Re: Keeping directory-discuss focused on the Directory Anonymous
• gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Anonymous
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Jean Louis
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Anonymous
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Paolo Bonzini
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Richard Stallman
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Daniel Wilkins
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Richard Stallman
  • gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Anonymous
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Richard Stallman
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Anonymous
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Jean Louis
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Jean Louis
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Jean Louis
  • Re: [security-discuss] gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users hellekin
  • Re: [security-discuss] gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users ng0
  • Re: [security-discuss] gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Richard Stallman
  • Re: [security-discuss] gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users ng0
  • Re: [security-discuss] gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users ng0
  • Re: [security-discuss] gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Richard Stallman
  • Re: [security-discuss] gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Richard Stallman
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Richard Stallman
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Richard Stallman
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Nomen Nescio
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Nomen Nescio
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Jean Louis
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Jean Louis
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Richard Stallman
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Anonymous
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Jean Louis
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Jean Louis
  • Re: gnuradio project DoS attacks GNU wget users Filip Brcic
  • GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Anonymous
  • Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Filip Brcic
  • Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Richard Stallman
  • Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Filip Brcic
  • Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Richard Stallman
  • Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Jean Louis
  • Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Richard Stallman
  • Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Jean Louis
  • Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Richard Stallman
  • Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Jean Louis
  • Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Richard Stallman
  • Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Jean Louis
  • Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Jean Louis
  • Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Jean Louis
  • Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Richard Stallman
  • Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Jean Louis
  • Re: GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript (was: gnuradio project..) Richard Stallman

• Earlier messages
• Later messages