On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, walter steff? wrote:
Running gnucap 2007-03-29 on a linux platform and with the following input file I get a segmentation fault. The fault dissappear when I remove the last G elements (those referring to the subckt port named GWg1TM1).The file is: ?#wr_lossyC .subckt ?wr_lossyC Wg1TE1 Wg1TM1 C1 ?1 ?0 ? 8.85419e-15 C2 ?2 ?0 ? 8.85419e-15
[...snip!...]
GWg1TM1_20 ?Wg1TM1 0 ?20 0 ?-2.91700e-03 G20_Wg1TM1 ?20 0 ?Wg1TM1 0 ?2.91700e-03 .ends ?wr_lossyC X ?Wg1TE1 wr_lossyC *>.option acct showall .print ac zi(Wg1TE1) .ac 100Meg 15G 20Meg >wr_lossyC_RM_TE10.plt .end
In Gnucap you need to run the analysis first, before asking for a print out. This behavior is different from SPICE, which doesn't care how you order your input cards. Yes, I agree that Gnucap shouldn't segfault, but should rather issue a warning when you try to print before having run an analysis. Stuart
_______________________________________________ Gnucap-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucap-devel
