On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 05:04:49PM -0600, Rob Browning wrote:
> David Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > When I looked at the code the algorithm seemed nonstandard to me,
> > and I want to make sure I use a standard GUID algorithm. It's well
> > tested and has proved itself. If Our algorithm is already standard,
> > then I just misread it; I'm human. If it's not, then I think it
> > should be.
>
> Well, we're using the standard md5sum code, and AFAIK, that's on very
> solid mathematical footing. I don't have references handy ATM,
> though. (Anyone?)
Forget it. Let's keep the GUID where it is. I simply misread it and
have been properly informed!
--
Dr. David C. Merrill http://www.lupercalia.net
Linux Documentation Project [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Collection Editor & Coordinator http://www.linuxdoc.org
Finger me for my public key
Corn and Grain, Corn and Grain
All that falls shall rise again
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
