It's been rumoured that David Merrill said: > The alternative is to assign a version number that increments each > time the record is updated. Then we need only check one field to know > if changes have been made. See any problems with that approach? That works, and seems to solve other problems as well ... --linas _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
- Re: Access Controls Derek Atkins
- Re: Access Controls Al Snell
- Re: Access Controls David Merrill
- Locks and Concurrency Christopher Browne
- Re: Access Controls David Merrill
- Re: Access Controls Dave Peticolas
- Re: Access Controls David Merrill
- Re: Access Controls linas
- Re: Access Controls Christopher Browne
- Re: Access Controls David Merrill
- GUID Management linas
- GUID Management Christopher Browne
- Re: GUID Management David Merrill
- Re: GUID Management Derek Atkins
- Re: GUID Management linas
- Re: Access Controls Derek Atkins
- Re: Access Controls linas
- Re: Access Controls Tyson Dowd
- Re: Access Controls linas
- Re: Access Controls Tyson Dowd
- Re: Access Controls Derek Atkins