It's been rumoured that David Merrill said:
> The alternative is to assign a version number that increments each
> time the record is updated. Then we need only check one field to know
> if changes have been made. See any problems with that approach?

That works, and seems to solve other problems as well ...

--linas

_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Reply via email to