Darryl Okahata writes:
> Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 27 February 2001 10:59, James LewisMoss wrote:
> > > etags != ctags
> > >
> > > ctags produces a vi tags file. etags produces an emacs tags file.
> >
> > I don't agree.
>
> For that matter, why is gnucash even trying to use either? Some
> people don't have ctags or etags, and, has been pointed out, may have
> buggy implementations. If some programmer wants to use ctags or etags,
> they can manually use them. It's not difficult, and running ctags/etags
> just unnecessarily slows down the build process.
>
I can't speak for anyone else, but I think having a tags file is very
useful, and IIRC it's a very small part of the time required to do the
build.
By the way, what's better about cscope?
------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Merkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<telsa> I left my client on #gtk+ overnight and there was nothing
in scrollback at all except quit/rejoins.
<bighead> telsa: well its been that for, I think 3 days now
(ever since started coming back on IRC)
<telsa> Clearly they are busy implementing telepathy,
and dog-fooding it. :)
------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel