On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 10:31, Derek Atkins wrote: > Quoting Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Another option would be to help with the G2 port. I've been > > anticipating doing the FS/SX QOFization "next" ... but _after_ the G2 > > port is done. Then the branching issues go away, we can get closer to > > release, &c. :) > > That sort of begs the question, what does it mean for the G2 port to be > "done"? > Personally I don't have a good answer for that, yet.
0/ Only gtk/gnome2 dependencies. :) 1/ "G1" functionality parity; assuming that we keep track of this in GNOME2_STATUS... 2/ GNOME2_STATUS list down to nothing/RFEs only (especially RFEs for things that aren't related to G2 dependencies, like the budgeting stuff or new iconage...) 3/ Some semblence of a coordinated effort to find more differences once we belive that there are no more. ...jsled -- http://asynchronous.org/ - `a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel