On Monday 22 August 2005 7:17 pm, Derek Atkins wrote: > I wasn't proposing that we _depend_ on libgoffice, but if it *IS* > available on the current platform I see no reason not to use it.... > Provided it's API compatible, of course.
I'll test that. I've got a sample snippet to put into configure.in which will omit the entire goffice subdirectory in lib/ from the build if goffice is found installed on the system. Naturally, the first time I build after goffice is installed is when I'll find out about API/ABI compatibility!! > Well, I think the issue is that some distros (read: Debian Unstable) :-) > I.e., we should try to build with the native version if we're building > on a distro that is "new enough" to provide it, but we should still > work on our target platform by using our own. > > At least that's how *I* think it should work ;) I'll get back to you . . . . -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpSQ0CqNGi4p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
