On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 14:55 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > I would advice against -Wno-error but rather switching off those > > particular warnings as described above. OTOH of course goffice shouldn't > > be fixed by us but rather by upstream. > > I think it's a case of our goffice being an incomplete copy of a snapshot > that > is under continuing development. Each release breaks ours a little more.
No. We've not updated the admittedly incomplete copy since it's initial import; our breakages are our own. :) I don't expect that we will update it again either. The main issue of contention is dependency-versions, around gnome-print and other gnome libraries that the official version of goffice is using. I do expect that we'll disable features (e.g. printing support) rather than try to make them work. OTOH, it would be really nice to either: - match the in-CVS libgoffice layout and files; I just made it compile in the quickest and dirtiest way I could, with little understanding of what should and shouldn't move into libgoffice, and where it should go. - do another copy of libgoffice as it exists now, and rollback it's dependencies to ours. But since we have something right now that does bascially work, either seems lower-prio at the moment in the face of the rest of GNOME2_STATUS. ...jsled -- http://asynchronous.org/ - `a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel