Generally, I'm happy with the proposed changes, and personally, I don't see anything wrong with invalidating the old names, especially as we're getting close to doing a new release branch anyway. The proposed structure looks fine to me. Of course, since I'm not doing any active development, none of this is really my call, but there's my comments anyway.
However, I do prefer the non-diff'd emails in gnucash-patches. Since I am not actively developing, I really don't get any value from seeing the diffs, but I do track development by reading the log comments (yes, they do get read!). If I'm the only one who thinks them useful, I will put up with the bigger emails, but I'd much prefer not to have to. Conrad. _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
