On 10/25/05, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem is that historically the commiters have been restricted to > a trusted > group of people, but there are a few "new" developers who have not yet been > given commit access. Honestly I can only think of one developer in > particular.
That is a function of the release process not the development process. Test Units and QA make for good releases, not the number of developers with commit access. The Linux kernel maybe a good comparison and it has a huge number of developers. So you could say the choice of source control system and thus list of release gatekeeper(s) dictates the set of developers who can manage the source easily. And at the end of the day results speak. Personally I still use gnucash for certain things because I prefer its simple ledger and speed. However in the last six months I've stopped recommending MS Money and started suggesting KMyMoney2 for basic users. Mainly because they seem to be going somewhere and producing things. -- Nicholas Lee http://stateless.geek.nz gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF 5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel